Farm Subsidy information
Hillsborough County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Hillsborough County, Florida, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 131
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $19,053,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Darrell D Ennis | Lakeland, FL 33810 | $22,847 |
42 | Sweet Blossom Cattle Company LLC | Ruskin, FL 33570 | $22,798 |
43 | Ultra Farms LLC | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $22,745 |
44 | Manuel Chavez-gutierrez | Plant City, FL 33565 | $22,319 |
45 | Ck Farms Inc | Dover, FL 33527 | $22,030 |
46 | Gillman Farms Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $21,901 |
47 | , | $21,713 | |
48 | Lonesome G Ranch LLC | Lithia, FL 33547 | $21,431 |
49 | Carlton And Carlton Ranches | Dover, FL 33527 | $19,676 |
50 | 5-d Tropical Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $18,813 |
51 | Sizemore Growers Inc | Plant City, FL 33567 | $18,762 |
52 | Robert E Smith | Odessa, FL 33556 | $18,011 |
53 | Earlow Costine | Lakeland, FL 33809 | $17,457 |
54 | K & S Cattle Hopewell LLC | Bartow, FL 33830 | $17,020 |
55 | Alonso Farms Corp | Plant City, FL 33565 | $14,972 |
56 | Benjamin A May | Duette, FL 34219 | $14,592 |
57 | Passion Farms LLC | Plant City, FL 33567 | $14,148 |
58 | Ercoli Farms Of Plant City Inc. | Plant City, FL 33565 | $13,972 |
59 | David L Coleman | Lithia, FL 33547 | $13,534 |
60 | Abram Cuesta | Tampa, FL 33625 | $11,806 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”