Farm Subsidy information
Hillsborough County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,075
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $175,713,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Two Brothers Bee Farm LLC | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $502,936 |
62 | Pepper Berry Farms Inc | Plant City, FL 33566 | $500,000 |
63 | San-way Farms, Inc. | Lithia, FL 33547 | $500,000 |
64 | Astin Ranch Inc | Plant City, FL 33563 | $500,000 |
65 | Sunripe Growers Corp | Plant City, FL 33565 | $490,716 |
66 | Hawk Produce Inc | Dover, FL 33527 | $485,463 |
67 | Charles D Martin | Riverview, FL 33569 | $484,880 |
68 | Meyer Aquatic Resources Inc | Brandon, FL 33511 | $480,934 |
69 | Tg Farms Inc | Dover, FL 33527 | $479,773 |
70 | Richard Rollison Dba Rollison Ranch | Lithia, FL 33547 | $463,478 |
71 | Buzbee Aquatics Inc | Tampa, FL 33619 | $459,960 |
72 | Paul Louis Haverlock | Brandon, FL 33511 | $449,555 |
73 | Manuel Chavez-gutierrez | Plant City, FL 33565 | $421,110 |
74 | Farm N 4 U | Plant City, FL 33565 | $417,662 |
75 | A & E Farms Group Corp | Plant City, FL 33565 | $410,898 |
76 | Aprile Farms Inc | Temple Terrace, FL 33617 | $405,456 |
77 | Lonesome G Ranch LLC | Lithia, FL 33547 | $402,605 |
78 | Valley Fisheries | Balm, FL 33503 | $394,409 |
79 | George H Sprouse | Plant City, FL 33567 | $378,823 |
80 | , | $375,816 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”