Total Disaster Programs in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 826
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $67,311,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Stephen V Schmidt | Plant City, FL 33565 | $160,000 |
62 | Ronald E Goodson | Dover, FL 33527 | $160,000 |
63 | Howard Johnson | Plant City, FL 33566 | $160,000 |
64 | John G Borchard | Plant City, FL 33564 | $160,000 |
65 | Frances M White | Durant, FL 33530 | $156,958 |
66 | Warner Aquatic Resources Inc | Ruskin, FL 33575 | $156,343 |
67 | Joel Drawdy | Clayton, AL 36016 | $155,267 |
68 | D & K Farms Inc | Plant City, FL 33566 | $154,720 |
69 | Heinke Tropicals Inc | Riverview, FL 33568 | $152,213 |
70 | Bruce Michael Lott | Seffner, FL 33584 | $150,568 |
71 | John Dukes Farms Inc | Dover, FL 33527 | $149,670 |
72 | Nuttin Fancy Farms Inc | Lithia, FL 33547 | $148,000 |
73 | Bayside Aquatics | Sun City Center, FL 33571 | $147,568 |
74 | Ervin Johnson | Plant City, FL 33567 | $146,956 |
75 | Fidel Castillo | Plant City, FL 33565 | $145,811 |
76 | Ultra Farms LLC | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $145,667 |
77 | Willie W Wingate | Dover, FL 33527 | $142,593 |
78 | Johnnie Beauchamp | Plant City, FL 33565 | $141,654 |
79 | Frederick E Futch | Plant City, FL 33566 | $141,521 |
80 | Mario E Flores | Plant City, FL 33566 | $141,517 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”