Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 124
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $887,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ellis Groves Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $1,780 |
62 | Maydell Smith | Plant City, FL 33565 | $1,680 |
63 | George Gonzalez | Riverview, FL 33569 | $1,594 |
64 | Herbert Overstreet | Lakeland, FL 33813 | $1,584 |
65 | Donald W Reed | Fort Meade, FL 33841 | $1,338 |
66 | Ercoli Farms | Plant City, FL 33565 | $1,335 |
67 | Perry Varn Sr. | Plant City, FL 33565 | $1,314 |
68 | Young Angus Enterprises | Dover, FL 33527 | $1,296 |
69 | Robert Van Fletcher | Lithia, FL 33547 | $1,130 |
70 | Pietro Ippolito | Riverview, FL 33569 | $1,071 |
71 | Don Hicks | Plant City, FL 33567 | $1,058 |
72 | William Andrew Halecky | Brandon, FL 33511 | $1,033 |
73 | Jay P Bolnick | Seffner, FL 33584 | $930 |
74 | Terry L. Robbins | Lakeland, FL 33811 | $900 |
75 | Kenneth L Wetherington Sr | Bartow, FL 33830 | $880 |
76 | Alfred H Varnum | Lithia, FL 33547 | $870 |
77 | Kathryn Suzanne Churchwell | Plant City, FL 33567 | $806 |
78 | A L Colding | Lithia, FL 33547 | $760 |
79 | Garland C Todd | Plant City, FL 33565 | $747 |
80 | Robert A Costine | Lakeland, FL 33810 | $730 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”