Total Disaster Programs in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 826
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $67,311,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Felipe G Chavez | Plant City, FL 33563 | $139,419 |
82 | San-way Farms | Sydney, FL 33587 | $137,800 |
83 | Arturo Cantu | Plant City, FL 33566 | $137,653 |
84 | Blues Berry Farm LLC | Plant City, FL 33567 | $135,536 |
85 | Golden A Cattle LLC | Tampa, FL 33647 | $135,394 |
86 | Astin Farms Inc | Plant City, FL 33563 | $135,000 |
87 | Royal Bee & Honey LLC | Tampa, FL 33647 | $134,166 |
88 | Maring Company | Plant City, FL 33564 | $130,300 |
89 | Sunscape Tree Farm, Inc. | Plant City, FL 33565 | $128,231 |
90 | Jaymar Farms Inc | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $127,400 |
91 | Holmberg Farms Inc | Lithia, FL 33547 | $125,000 |
92 | Mike Lott Farms LLC | Seffner, FL 33584 | $125,000 |
93 | John Goddard Produce Inc | Lakeland, FL 33815 | $125,000 |
94 | Shoop Hay Service LLC | Balm, FL 33503 | $124,739 |
95 | Henry Hutto | Dover, FL 33527 | $124,206 |
96 | S Mcdonald Farms Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $123,914 |
97 | Blackwater Creek Ranch Inc | Kathleen, FL 33849 | $122,479 |
98 | Gary Swindle | Ruskin, FL 33570 | $120,811 |
99 | Francisco G Chavez | Plant City, FL 33563 | $119,880 |
100 | Benson Dukes | Plant City, FL 33566 | $119,768 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”