Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32

Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $3,406,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments
1995-2023
1Oakridge Fish Hatchery Inc %davidPlant City, FL 33565$445,154
2R P Co IncPlant City, FL 33565$378,244
3Rickie Simmons & Son Tropical FisRuskin, FL 33570$334,432
4Shannon GainesRuskin, FL 33570$282,117
5Carter's Fish Hatchery IncWimauma, FL 33598$244,924
65-d Tropical IncPlant City, FL 33565$238,668
7Ed Parker Trop Fish IncApollo Beach, FL 33572$209,529
8Liles Tropical Fish IncRuskin, FL 33575$192,560
9Rawlins Tropical Fish Farm LLCLithia, FL 33547$171,164
10Steve Simmons Aquatics IncRuskin, FL 33570$125,000
11Razorback Ranch II LLCTampa, FL 33606$82,432
12Aquatic Collectors Of Florida IncWimauma, FL 33598$76,528
13L & J Citrus & Cattle LLCWauchula, FL 33873$72,288
14Golden Pond Tropicals IncWimauma, FL 33598$69,333
15Wayne Tanner Tropical Fish IncWimauma, FL 33598$63,588
16Farm N 4 UPlant City, FL 33565$46,737
17Picnic Block Holdings IncLake Placid, FL 33852$45,575
18Simmons Grove & Cattle Co IncLake Placid, FL 33852$43,054
19Buzbee Tropical Fish LLCRiverview, FL 33568$42,745
20Ledford Tropical Fish Farm IncRiverview, FL 33568$42,192

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag