Total Disaster Programs in Hillsborough County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 769
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Hillsborough County, Florida totaled $41,492,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dan Goodson | Dover, FL 33527 | $264,240 |
22 | John D White | Plant City, FL 33567 | $255,403 |
23 | Wayne Tanner Tropical Fish Inc | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $250,500 |
24 | Wallace Peacock | Dover, FL 33527 | $250,182 |
25 | Aquatica Tropicals Inc % Marty Ta | Plant City, FL 33566 | $242,206 |
26 | 5-d Tropical Inc | Plant City, FL 33565 | $238,668 |
27 | Andy Rogers | Dover, FL 33527 | $237,415 |
28 | Lonesome G Ranch LLC | Lithia, FL 33547 | $234,526 |
29 | Loren E Mercer Jr | Dover, FL 33527 | $224,974 |
30 | C & S Tropical Inc | Sun City Center, FL 33571 | $220,038 |
31 | Francisco Osorio Osorio | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $216,442 |
32 | St Martin Farm | Plant City, FL 33566 | $211,837 |
33 | Triple Crown Berry Farm Inc | Dover, FL 33527 | $209,862 |
34 | Sunshine Aquatic Farms Inc | Tampa, FL 33610 | $206,494 |
35 | Brandon Farms Inc | Sydney, FL 33587 | $203,197 |
36 | Richard E Peacock | Plant City, FL 33567 | $197,782 |
37 | Florida Star Farms Inc | Plant City, FL 33563 | $194,600 |
38 | Bob Teegardin | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $192,203 |
39 | Martin Chavez | Dover, FL 33527 | $183,866 |
40 | Russell Eric Goodson | Dover, FL 33527 | $177,684 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”