Farm Subsidy information
Indian River County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Indian River County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 550
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Indian River County, Florida totaled $128,296,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Sebastian River Farms LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32964 | $133,583 |
102 | Harmony Corp Of Usa | Oakland Park, FL 33311 | $132,098 |
103 | Paul T Kirtley | Palm Bay, FL 32909 | $131,824 |
104 | Ox Creek Ranch LLC | Port Salerno, FL 34992 | $131,115 |
105 | Mirela Pal | Fellsmere, FL 32948 | $130,181 |
106 | Blue Goose Growers LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $128,390 |
107 | Bernard Egan & Company | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $127,322 |
108 | Hale Family LLC | Wabasso, FL 32970 | $123,495 |
109 | Bailey Investments Inc | Boca Raton, FL 33432 | $122,060 |
110 | Kennedy Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $118,975 |
111 | The Oyster Bed Inc Dba The Clam B | Keystone Heights, FL 32656 | $116,347 |
112 | Allen Zern | Larchmont, NY 10538 | $115,894 |
113 | Central Groves Corporation | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $115,042 |
114 | Orchid Island Shellfish Co | Melbourne Beach, FL 32951 | $113,981 |
115 | Claude E Meadows III | Jackson, MO 63755 | $112,500 |
116 | Charles R Sexton Trust | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $109,146 |
117 | John H Stockamore Trust | Ft Lauderdale, FL 33308 | $106,875 |
118 | Sempre Citrus Co Inc | Sewickley, PA 15143 | $106,591 |
119 | Treasure Coast Turf Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $105,509 |
120 | Fulford Citrus Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $105,451 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”