Total Disaster Programs in Indian River County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 463
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Indian River County, Florida totaled $64,694,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Robert G Sexton | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $68,534 |
142 | Leroy Smith Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $68,238 |
143 | Abraham Barkett | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $68,016 |
144 | Baldwin Sod Farms | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $67,920 |
145 | George F Hamner Jr | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $63,701 |
146 | Uncle Matts Fresh Inc | Clermont, FL 34711 | $63,000 |
147 | Derek Muller | Sebastian, FL 32958 | $62,753 |
148 | 152 West LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $62,370 |
149 | F & G Ocean Ventures Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $61,994 |
150 | Catherine Detko | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $61,489 |
151 | John J Schumann III | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $60,370 |
152 | Wilton Banack | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $59,700 |
153 | Jorge Latour | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $59,654 |
154 | Gerald Clontz | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $59,422 |
155 | Calvin Bethel | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $57,751 |
156 | Cpr Grove | Virginia Beach, VA 23462 | $57,374 |
157 | Earl A Hobbs Jr | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $57,142 |
158 | Peter D Spyke | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $56,875 |
159 | Byron Beatty | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $56,002 |
160 | Samuel Pryor | Wabasso, FL 32970 | $55,575 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”