Farm Subsidy information
Manatee County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Manatee County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 463
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Manatee County, Florida totaled $106,312,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cameron Dakin Dairy Company | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $2,406,071 |
2 | Esda Inc | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $1,856,685 |
3 | Sorrells Groves Inc | Arcadia, FL 34265 | $1,158,944 |
4 | Fruitwood Apiaries Inc | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $1,134,937 |
5 | Old Florida Bee Company LLC | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $1,000,577 |
6 | Mello & Sons Apiaries Inc | Palmetto, FL 34221 | $987,660 |
7 | Jacob's Farm, Inc. | Dunkirk, NY 14048 | $906,073 |
8 | Farren Dakin Dairy LLC | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $817,502 |
9 | Farren R Dakin | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $761,631 |
10 | Hardiman Produce | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $752,727 |
11 | Grainger Farms, LLC | Bradenton, FL 34202 | $636,875 |
12 | Grainger Farms Inc | Bradenton, FL 34211 | $551,242 |
13 | A & G Bees, Inc. | Bradenton, FL 34210 | $501,891 |
14 | Utopia Farms II LLC | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $500,000 |
15 | 4 Star Tomato Inc | Ellenton, FL 34222 | $430,980 |
16 | Beerom Apiaries Inc | Bradenton, FL 34210 | $394,828 |
17 | Janice Lee Ranch | Nocatee, FL 34268 | $379,703 |
18 | James D. Brewer And E Coleman Brewer | Nocatee, FL 34268 | $367,415 |
19 | , | $335,672 | |
20 | Falkner Farms | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $313,700 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>