Farm Subsidy information
Manatee County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Manatee County, Florida, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 82
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Manatee County, Florida totaled $5,385,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Pure Florida Apiary | Bradenton, FL 34209 | $25,463 |
22 | Sorrells Groves Inc | Arcadia, FL 34265 | $19,576 |
23 | Marsha Parks | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $12,507 |
24 | Two Docks Shellfish LLC | Bradenton, FL 34206 | $12,190 |
25 | Taylor Cattle & Citrus LLC | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $11,539 |
26 | Michael Manning | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $10,274 |
27 | Hardiman Produce | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $8,966 |
28 | Clyde E Ballard Jr | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $8,925 |
29 | Anson Cattle Company | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $8,561 |
30 | Corbett Mitchell John | Parrish, FL 34219 | $8,546 |
31 | Albert D. Cacchiotti III | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $6,435 |
32 | James Keen | Parrish, FL 34219 | $6,211 |
33 | Southern Pine Tree Farm Inc | Palmetto, FL 34221 | $5,322 |
34 | Jesse Kersey | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $5,262 |
35 | Tactix Farms LLC | Bradenton, FL 34211 | $5,149 |
36 | David C Turner III | Mulberry, FL 33860 | $4,779 |
37 | Taylor Farms LLC | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $4,432 |
38 | John Vodila | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $4,399 |
39 | Robert G. Jones | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $4,235 |
40 | Robert A Mccranie | Palmetto, FL 34221 | $3,960 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”