Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Martin County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 127
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Martin County, Florida totaled $29,250,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Lazy Daze Orchids Inc | Palm City, FL 34990 | $14,725 |
102 | Nea Ung | Palm City, FL 34991 | $14,250 |
103 | Sanith Ourn | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $12,825 |
104 | Loc T Tran | Stuart, FL 34996 | $12,540 |
105 | Khorn Khin | Palm City, FL 34991 | $12,350 |
106 | Sun Bell Citrus Inc | Boca Raton, FL 33486 | $11,408 |
107 | Phatsanee Salajai | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $11,163 |
108 | Songsak Niyomkun | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $10,925 |
109 | Eng Ponn | Palm City, FL 34990 | $10,830 |
110 | Sam Sorn | Port St Lucie, FL 34953 | $9,833 |
111 | Winai Salajai | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $9,310 |
112 | Kun T Suon | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $8,171 |
113 | 6595 Parklane West Inc | Boynton Beach, FL 33436 | $7,989 |
114 | Pamela Prak | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $6,793 |
115 | Palm Tree Ranch | Palm City, FL 34990 | $6,273 |
116 | Philip J Grant | West Palm Beach, FL 33405 | $6,077 |
117 | Evergreen Farm Produce | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $5,131 |
118 | Mao Keo | Port St Lucie, FL 34953 | $5,131 |
119 | Angel Arya | West Palm Beach, FL 33411 | $4,987 |
120 | James M Alderman Sr | Boynton Beach, FL 33474 | $3,105 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”