Farm Subsidy information
Martin County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Martin County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 347
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Martin County, Florida totaled $88,706,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Turner Groves Citrus Limited Part | Fort Myers, FL 33916 | $462,600 |
| 22 | Florida Association Of Rc&d Counc | Orlando, FL 32822 | $454,835 |
| 23 | Boney Grove LLC | Clewiston, FL 33440 | $431,000 |
| 24 | Latt Maxcy Corporation | Lake Wales, FL 33859 | $380,476 |
| 25 | Deshields Grove Inc | Boca Raton, FL 33486 | $360,000 |
| 26 | Arrow C Cattle Corp | Okeechobee, FL 34973 | $346,478 |
| 27 | Green Giant Foliage Inc | Greenacres, FL 33454 | $331,668 |
| 28 | Tampa Farm Service Inc | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $300,897 |
| 29 | Sunshine State Carnations Inc | Hobe Sound, FL 33475 | $298,158 |
| 30 | Shadow Lake Groves Inc | Stuart, FL 34994 | $295,562 |
| 31 | Cecil O Stanley | Delray Beach, FL 33483 | $293,220 |
| 32 | First Choice Landscaping & Nurser | Wellington, FL 33414 | $287,696 |
| 33 | James D Blood | Delray Beach, FL 33483 | $281,150 |
| 34 | Westwinds Nursery Inc | Palm City, FL 34990 | $271,359 |
| 35 | Sanith Ourn | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $263,962 |
| 36 | Farish Family Limited Partnership | West Palm Beach, FL 33402 | $251,078 |
| 37 | Martin Grove Land Trust | Miami, FL 33176 | $249,605 |
| 38 | Good-minton Citrus LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $235,967 |
| 39 | 4l Land & Cattle LLC | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $233,642 |
| 40 | Camayen Cattle Co | West Palm Beach, FL 33405 | $226,789 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf