Farm Subsidy information
Martin County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Martin County, Florida, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 67
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Martin County, Florida totaled $5,139,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thomas Edward Smith | Palm City, FL 34990 | $43,037 |
22 | Crown Ventures LLC | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $39,666 |
23 | Hour Seng Ngoun | Port St Lucie, FL 34953 | $35,484 |
24 | Khin Produce Inc | Palm City, FL 34991 | $31,734 |
25 | Florida Raw LLC | West Palm Beach, FL 33407 | $31,240 |
26 | Lim Phal | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $29,481 |
27 | Greg S Flewelling | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $27,108 |
28 | Terry G Peacock | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $26,237 |
29 | Legg Cattle Co LLC | Palm City, FL 34990 | $25,685 |
30 | Cecil O Stanley | Delray Beach, FL 33483 | $24,548 |
31 | C-23 Cattle Company | Palm City, FL 34990 | $21,846 |
32 | Newt Mattson | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $21,582 |
33 | Harry B Patterson | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $20,996 |
34 | George L Rhoden | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $19,394 |
35 | Hani Honey Company LLC | Stuart, FL 34997 | $16,800 |
36 | Live Advantage Bait LLC | Jupiter, FL 33458 | $16,090 |
37 | Ctr Cattle LLC | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $14,685 |
38 | Flying P Ranch LLC | Hobe Sound, FL 33455 | $13,970 |
39 | Raymond S Sheltra | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $13,024 |
40 | Lucas Mateo Espada | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $12,516 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”