Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program in Martin County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 70
Recipients of Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program from farms in Martin County, Florida totaled $2,113,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bonita Groves Inc | West Palm Beach, FL 33414 | $160,000 |
| 2 | Becker B-14 Grove Ltd | Fort Pierce, FL 34981 | $160,000 |
| 3 | Riverland And Indian Sun Lc | Wauchula, FL 33873 | $160,000 |
| 4 | Caulkins Citrus Company Ltd | Indiantown, FL 34956 | $149,520 |
| 5 | Becker Holding Corporation | Fort Pierce, FL 34981 | $112,766 |
| 6 | Westwinds Nursery Inc | Palm City, FL 34990 | $80,000 |
| 7 | Green Giant Foliage Inc | Lake Worth, FL 33454 | $80,000 |
| 8 | Star Farms Corp | Belle Glade, FL 33430 | $80,000 |
| 9 | First Choice Landscaping & Nurser | Wellington, FL 33414 | $80,000 |
| 10 | Trailside Groves LLC | Stuart, FL 34997 | $80,000 |
| 11 | Leapfrog LLC | West Palm Beach, FL 33410 | $80,000 |
| 12 | Deshields Grove Inc | Boca Raton, FL 33486 | $75,875 |
| 13 | Joseph Blue & Sons Nursery Inc | Palm City, FL 34990 | $66,366 |
| 14 | Evans Properties Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $63,520 |
| 15 | Diamond Tomato Partnership | Fort Pierce, FL 34982 | $54,002 |
| 16 | Agri Gators Inc | Palm City, FL 34991 | $53,369 |
| 17 | Good-minton Citrus LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $47,967 |
| 18 | Palm City Palm & Tropical | Palm City, FL 34990 | $41,133 |
| 19 | Fox Brown Road LLC | West Palm Beach, FL 33411 | $36,090 |
| 20 | Farish Family Limited Partnership | West Palm Beach, FL 33402 | $35,169 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
