Farm Subsidy information

Martin County, Florida

Total Subsidies in Martin County, Florida, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 349

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Martin County, Florida totaled $96,314,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Tesoro Groves Limited PartnershipFort Myers, FL 33916$4,878,280
2Running W CitrusFort Myers, FL 33916$3,988,710
3Becker B-14 Grove LtdFort Pierce, FL 34981$2,392,968
4Caulkins Citrus Company LtdIndiantown, FL 34956$1,905,705
5Becker Holding CorporationFort Pierce, FL 34981$1,746,877
6Joseph Blue & Sons Nursery IncPalm City, FL 34990$1,591,568
7Riverland And Indian Sun LcWauchula, FL 33873$1,570,844
8Plantation Creek LLCPalm City, FL 34991$1,564,850
9Evans Properties IncVero Beach, FL 32963$1,233,279
10Bonita Groves IncWest Palm Beach, FL 33414$879,100
11Star Farms CorpBelle Glade, FL 33430$796,115
12Palm City Palm & TropicalPalm City, FL 34990$751,276
13Gardinier Florida Citrus IncSarasota, FL 34240$730,160
14Westwinds Nursery 2011, LLCPalm City, FL 34990$629,711
15Trailside Groves LLCStuart, FL 34997$594,025
16Agri Gators IncPalm City, FL 34991$583,701
17Aquacalma LpHouston, TX 77027$545,750
18Long Land CoPalm City, FL 34991$530,618
19B-4 Grove PartnershipFort Pierce, FL 34981$516,830
20Sunrise Citrus Groves IncHobe Sound, FL 33455$510,090

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag