Total Commodity Programs in Orange County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 118
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Orange County, Florida totaled $7,528,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dewar Nurseries Inc | Apopka, FL 32703 | $712,180 |
2 | Korus Orchid Corporation | Plymouth, FL 32768 | $508,108 |
3 | Agri Starts Inc | Apopka, FL 32712 | $500,000 |
4 | Mercer Botanicals Inc | Zellwood, FL 32798 | $475,781 |
5 | Happy Plants LLC | Mount Dora, FL 32756 | $372,003 |
6 | Nams Nursery Inc | Apopka, FL 32712 | $337,220 |
7 | Arc Ferns LLC | Apopka, FL 32712 | $250,000 |
8 | Amr Nursery LLC | Zellwood, FL 32798 | $247,469 |
9 | Moss Hill Foliage Inc | Apopka, FL 32712 | $220,830 |
10 | Treemendous Quality Growers LLC | Apopka, FL 32704 | $215,176 |
11 | Bruce Jensen Nurseries Florida Ll | Apopka, FL 32703 | $207,900 |
12 | Golden Vision Flower Inc | Apopka, FL 32712 | $198,476 |
13 | Mt Plymouth Greenhouses Inc | Plymouth, FL 32768 | $191,335 |
14 | Branette Farm LLC | Apopka, FL 32712 | $190,141 |
15 | Green Masters Inc | Apopka, FL 32703 | $175,395 |
16 | Biostok LLC | Plymouth, FL 32768 | $133,097 |
17 | Brentwood Nursery III Inc | Orlando, FL 32822 | $111,937 |
18 | The Green Machine Inc | Winter Garden, FL 34778 | $108,488 |
19 | Ambs Foliage Inc | Apopka, FL 32712 | $103,802 |
20 | J & L Gardenias Inc Dba Jerry's G | Apopka, FL 32712 | $97,699 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>