Farm Subsidy information
Pasco County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Pasco County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 642
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pasco County, Florida totaled $32,984,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert L Hall | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $111,517 |
42 | Depue Ranch LLC | Zephyrhills, FL 33545 | $109,027 |
43 | Keathel Chauncey | Zephyrhills, FL 33540 | $106,296 |
44 | Craig L Bexley | Oxford, FL 34484 | $105,796 |
45 | Carlton And Carlton Ranches | Dover, FL 33527 | $105,161 |
46 | F & W Cattle Co | Lakeland, FL 33804 | $100,897 |
47 | Mickieblue Berry LLC | Tampa, FL 33606 | $96,487 |
48 | Schrader Family Farms LLC | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $93,925 |
49 | Tags Pride Produce /dba/ Darby Fa | Dade City, FL 33525 | $93,680 |
50 | Christine Phillips | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $91,597 |
51 | Trees By Bob Wood | Lutz, FL 33559 | $90,000 |
52 | Charles Combs Jr | Zephyrhills, FL 33542 | $89,573 |
53 | Jerry Gilley | Dade City, FL 33525 | $85,940 |
54 | Ernest L Peeples Trust | Zephyrhills, FL 33539 | $83,624 |
55 | Henry C Young III | Dade City, FL 33525 | $82,914 |
56 | Fea Landscape Association | Dade City, FL 33523 | $82,285 |
57 | Robert C Southern | Dade City, FL 33526 | $75,951 |
58 | J-mac Cattle LLC | Dade City, FL 33523 | $74,221 |
59 | Walter M Rowland Jr | Dade City, FL 33525 | $73,489 |
60 | Grand Bar Ranch LLC | Dade City, FL 33523 | $67,668 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”