Farm Subsidy information
Pasco County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Pasco County, Florida, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 137
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pasco County, Florida totaled $1,672,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sid Larkin & Son Inc | Dade City, FL 33526 | $4,089 |
42 | Stephen F Melton | Dade City, FL 33523 | $3,741 |
43 | James Simmons | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $3,567 |
44 | Chester W Taylor | Dade City, FL 33526 | $3,269 |
45 | Oro Brangus Inc | Land O Lakes, FL 34638 | $3,158 |
46 | Cadberry Farms Inc | Tarpon Springs, FL 34688 | $3,147 |
47 | Gude Family Cattle Co | Dade City, FL 33523 | $3,081 |
48 | Ken Cummins | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $2,668 |
49 | Plazewski Farms LLC | Wesley Chapel, FL 33545 | $2,544 |
50 | Henry C Young III | Dade City, FL 33525 | $2,540 |
51 | Robert L Davenport Sr | Wimauma, FL 33598 | $2,535 |
52 | Greg Troupe | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $2,210 |
53 | Kerry Johnson | Spring Hill, FL 34610 | $2,097 |
54 | Henry L King III | Lutz, FL 33559 | $2,043 |
55 | J S L Ranch Inc | Dade City, FL 33526 | $2,037 |
56 | Lewis J Bradford | Dade City, FL 33523 | $2,016 |
57 | Larkin Cattle Company Inc | Dade City, FL 33526 | $1,933 |
58 | Pat Nathe Groves Inc | Dade City, FL 33523 | $1,915 |
59 | W Square Cattle Ranch LLC | Zephyrhills, FL 33540 | $1,743 |
60 | Frank Hopewell | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $1,698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”