Total Commodity Programs in Pasco County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 202
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pasco County, Florida totaled $5,582,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mccabe Farms | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $28,641 |
42 | Hawk Ranch Inc | Clearwater, FL 33756 | $27,335 |
43 | Sid Larkin & Son Inc | Dade City, FL 33526 | $26,501 |
44 | Robert C Southern | Dade City, FL 33526 | $26,337 |
45 | Rowland Farms Inc | Dade City, FL 33525 | $25,721 |
46 | Dillard Cattle Company LLC | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $25,278 |
47 | Grand Bar Ranch LLC | Dade City, FL 33523 | $25,166 |
48 | Blueberry Blessings Inc | New Port Richey, FL 34654 | $24,213 |
49 | Christine Phillips | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $24,104 |
50 | Steven W Gant | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $22,448 |
51 | Daniel J Dettman Dba/ D & V Cattle | Wesley Chapel, FL 33543 | $21,998 |
52 | Robert L Hall | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $21,180 |
53 | W Fisher Bee Farm | Dade City, FL 33525 | $21,155 |
54 | Schrader Family Farms LLC | San Antonio, FL 33576 | $21,098 |
55 | Stephen F Melton | Dade City, FL 33523 | $19,218 |
56 | John A Williams | New Port Richey, FL 34655 | $18,927 |
57 | Oro Brangus Inc | Land O Lakes, FL 34638 | $18,128 |
58 | Charles D Waller | Dade City, FL 33526 | $18,121 |
59 | James Simmons | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $18,076 |
60 | Cadberry Farms Inc | Tarpon Springs, FL 34688 | $17,749 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”