Total Conservation Programs in Polk County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 243
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Polk County, Florida totaled $2,429,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jones Gillispie Clyatt Grove | Fort Meade, FL 33841 | $10,288 |
82 | Louis H Mcteer & Harold Mcteer | Haines City, FL 33844 | $10,125 |
83 | Kathaleen C Dunham | Frostproof, FL 33843 | $10,079 |
84 | Nancy J Schafer | Orlando, FL 32801 | $10,000 |
85 | Milroc Inc | Cashiers, NC 28717 | $10,000 |
86 | Justin S Martin | Haines City, FL 33845 | $9,803 |
87 | R K G Of Polk County Inc | Lake Wales, FL 33898 | $9,766 |
88 | Sporran Inc C/o Taylor Stewart Ho | Jacksonville, FL 32204 | $9,638 |
89 | Tommy Thayer Jr | Dundee, FL 33838 | $9,563 |
90 | Harold A Coates Jr | Fort Meade, FL 33841 | $9,497 |
91 | Nettie Groves Inc | Lake Wales, FL 33898 | $9,370 |
92 | Sam Manly Trust | Waverly, FL 33877 | $9,353 |
93 | John S Langford | Alturas, FL 33820 | $9,263 |
94 | Carl Sons | Haines City, FL 33844 | $9,174 |
95 | Robert Sons | Haines City, FL 33845 | $9,173 |
96 | T & T Citrus Inc | Avon Park, FL 33825 | $9,105 |
97 | Scim Inc | Fort Meade, FL 33841 | $9,002 |
98 | M Lewis King | Lakeland, FL 33807 | $9,000 |
99 | Richard Lamar Edwards | Winter Haven, FL 33881 | $9,000 |
100 | Bamaturc Groves Inc | Winter Haven, FL 33880 | $8,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”