Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Putnam County, Florida, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 64

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Putnam County, Florida totaled $2,615,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1L & M Farms Of North Florida LLCRaleigh, NC 27604$304,522
2Ronald Harris Fern Co IncCrescent City, FL 32112$267,291
3Byrnes Farms IncHastings, FL 32145$250,000
4Bulls-hit Ranch & Farm IncHastings, FL 32145$240,176
5Michael O Revels SrHastings, FL 32145$212,456
6Singleton And Sons Farms IncHastings, FL 32145$197,984
7James G FrazelGrandin, FL 32138$192,345
8Stewart Witt Farms LLCEast Palatka, FL 32131$144,911
9Robert T HerringtonSan Mateo, FL 32187$76,835
10Forest Groves IncCrescent City, FL 32112$76,815
11Crescent Lake Farms LLCHastings, FL 32145$75,221
12Sandridge Cattle Company LLCGreen Cove Springs, FL 32043$58,520
13Ornamental Plants And Trees IncHawthorne, FL 32640$48,072
14J & A Land Co IncSeville, FL 32190$45,181
15Clayton A Largacci D/b/a 4-c FarmEast Palatka, FL 32131$41,812
16Christy R LargacciEast Palatka, FL 32131$41,812
17Hammond Station Growers IncSeville, FL 32190$37,277
18David W RegisterSeville, FL 32190$34,653
19Palatka Cattle Company LLCPalatka, FL 32177$26,263
20Worldwide Aquaponics IAtlanta, GA 30350$18,104

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag