Total Commodity Programs in Saint Johns County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 62
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Johns County, Florida totaled $9,023,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John Hunt Farms | East Palatka, FL 32131 | $9,550 |
42 | H Wesley Smith | Hastings, FL 32145 | $8,695 |
43 | Wesley Wells Farms LLC | Saint Augustine, FL 32092 | $8,344 |
44 | Phil Cubbedge Dba Matanzas River | St Augustine, FL 32086 | $6,151 |
45 | J Bourke Floyd Estate | Elkton, FL 32033 | $5,782 |
46 | Singleton And Sons Farms Inc | Hastings, FL 32145 | $5,606 |
47 | Larry Byrd Farms | Elkton, FL 32033 | $5,184 |
48 | Lupe A Curtis | Elkton, FL 32033 | $4,440 |
49 | Bryan C Lanier | St Augustine, FL 32080 | $4,374 |
50 | Bulls-hit Ranch & Farm Inc | Hastings, FL 32145 | $4,255 |
51 | Betty Brubaker | Elkton, FL 32033 | $3,861 |
52 | Blue Sky Farms | Hastings, FL 32145 | $3,040 |
53 | J Leighton Middleton | Elkton, FL 32033 | $2,941 |
54 | Michael J Ranguette | St Augustine, FL 32086 | $2,397 |
55 | P & S Parker Farms | Elkton, FL 32033 | $2,168 |
56 | Andrea Hunter D/b/a The Datil Farm | Saint Augustine, FL 32086 | $1,783 |
57 | James C Singleton | East Palatka, FL 32131 | $564 |
58 | Stephen J Singleton | San Mateo, FL 32187 | $564 |
59 | Alton J Kersey | Saint Augustine, FL 32084 | $439 |
60 | Gene Povia | Elkton, FL 32033 | $193 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”