Total Disaster Programs in Saint Lucie County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 554
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Saint Lucie County, Florida totaled $91,596,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ridge Farms LLC | Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 | $147,122 |
122 | Matthew Wynne | Port St Lucie, FL 34952 | $146,038 |
123 | Three Putt LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $144,504 |
124 | Edible Commodities LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34947 | $142,996 |
125 | Diamond Tomato Partnership | Fort Pierce, FL 34982 | $142,690 |
126 | Basil Goombs | Coral Springs, FL 33065 | $142,500 |
127 | Citrus Star Inc | Brooklyn, NY 11222 | $140,568 |
128 | Michael W Hanley | Loxahatchee, FL 33470 | $133,387 |
129 | R Matt Pearce | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $131,440 |
130 | J Alderman Farms Inc | Boynton Beach, FL 33474 | $131,341 |
131 | Circle O Ranch Inc | Windermere, FL 34786 | $126,054 |
132 | Riverside Citrus Harvesting LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $125,000 |
133 | Helseth Corporation | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $124,673 |
134 | Robert W Norvell Sr | Port Saint Lucie, FL 34987 | $122,159 |
135 | Holly Hill Fruit Co Inc | Davenport, FL 33836 | $121,333 |
136 | Peter D Spyke | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $120,574 |
137 | Agro Growers Inc | Southwest Ranches, FL 33332 | $118,554 |
138 | Varn Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $118,029 |
139 | Peacock Investments Of South Flor | Miami, FL 33143 | $116,400 |
140 | Scott Citrus Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $115,951 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”