Farm Subsidy information
Saint Lucie County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Saint Lucie County, Florida, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 79
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Lucie County, Florida totaled $7,375,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wescott Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $473,131 |
| 2 | Scott Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $271,959 |
| 3 | Img Citrus Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $250,000 |
| 4 | Snapper Creek Nsy LLC | Miami, FL 33116 | $200,425 |
| 5 | Ru-mar Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $106,966 |
| 6 | Palms Direct LLC | Port Saint Lucie, FL 34983 | $90,544 |
| 7 | Bcrl Farms Inc Dba Sun Turf | Port St Lucie, FL 34987 | $73,149 |
| 8 | Seaventure Clam Co | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | $56,891 |
| 9 | Citrus Star Inc | Homestead, FL 33030 | $45,499 |
| 10 | Clyde D Crouch | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $34,337 |
| 11 | Mcdermid Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34950 | $23,685 |
| 12 | Diamond 3 Cattle Company LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $23,178 |
| 13 | Tri-county Farms, LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34947 | $21,201 |
| 14 | Neillco Cattle LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $17,335 |
| 15 | The Poor Farm LLC | Port St Lucie, FL 34987 | $16,244 |
| 16 | Miller Ranch & Cattle LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34947 | $14,121 |
| 17 | Flying L Cattle LLC | Lake Wales, FL 33898 | $13,791 |
| 18 | Hayman Sukram | Miramar, FL 33023 | $10,690 |
| 19 | Sandscrub LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $10,521 |
| 20 | Mcl Properties LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $9,635 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf