Total Disaster Programs in Saint Lucie County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 546
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Saint Lucie County, Florida totaled $89,591,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Arcco Of St Lucie LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34979 | $818,155 |
| 22 | Northwood LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $811,440 |
| 23 | B-11 Grove Partnership | Fort Pierce, FL 34981 | $789,751 |
| 24 | Valencia River Associates Limited | Fort Myers, FL 33907 | $690,562 |
| 25 | Indian Sunburst Associates Limite | Fort Myers, FL 33907 | $681,236 |
| 26 | Alco Joint Venture Llp | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $638,482 |
| 27 | Triple M Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $597,395 |
| 28 | William R Daniels Living Trust | Plant City, FL 33566 | $590,923 |
| 29 | Heller Bros Packing Co | Winter Garden, FL 34777 | $584,835 |
| 30 | Cracker Trail Groves Llp | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $533,852 |
| 31 | Citcran Corporation | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $531,154 |
| 32 | Cartay Groves LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $508,486 |
| 33 | Mcdermid Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34950 | $498,599 |
| 34 | Adams Ranch Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34979 | $481,888 |
| 35 | Bowden Family Holdings Ltd | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $457,418 |
| 36 | All Right Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $443,521 |
| 37 | Mabel Groves Limited | Orlando, FL 32856 | $443,459 |
| 38 | Tradition Development Company | Fort Lauderdale, FL 33310 | $429,300 |
| 39 | Ru-mar Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34947 | $426,846 |
| 40 | Martin Properties Of Palm Beach C | Boynton Beach, FL 33436 | $411,899 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf