Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program in Saint Lucie County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 198
Recipients of Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program from farms in Saint Lucie County, Florida totaled $5,411,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Dunn Groves & Ranch LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $69,059 |
| 22 | Sexton Grove Holdings Ltd | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $64,564 |
| 23 | Black LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $64,140 |
| 24 | Arcco Of St Lucie LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34979 | $63,387 |
| 25 | Russakis Groves | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $60,939 |
| 26 | Hammock Groves | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $58,539 |
| 27 | A & G Groves Leasing Co | Wabasso, FL 32970 | $57,779 |
| 28 | Robert Bowden | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $57,046 |
| 29 | Story Properties | Ocoee, FL 34761 | $56,180 |
| 30 | Double George Groves | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $55,687 |
| 31 | Daniel T Mccarty III | Fort Pierce, FL 34948 | $54,853 |
| 32 | Buck Hammock Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $54,564 |
| 33 | Cartay Groves LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $54,033 |
| 34 | Helseth & Helseth Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $50,576 |
| 35 | Barnes Citrus Enterprises Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32962 | $49,184 |
| 36 | Howard J Beville Jr | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $47,815 |
| 37 | William R Daniels Living Trust | Plant City, FL 33566 | $47,006 |
| 38 | J Brantley Schirard | Fort Pierce, FL 34982 | $46,277 |
| 39 | Img Citrus Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $45,541 |
| 40 | Estes Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $45,441 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf