Farm Subsidy information
Sarasota County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Sarasota County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 105
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sarasota County, Florida totaled $12,167,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hi Hat Ranch Lllp | Sarasota, FL 34240 | $890,863 |
2 | Peachey Dairy Inc | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $362,655 |
3 | Treasure Coast Groves | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $356,676 |
4 | A R S Arena & Feedlot Inc | Sarasota, FL 34240 | $232,565 |
5 | Longino Ranch Inc | Sidell, FL 34266 | $222,726 |
6 | Mabry Carlton Ranch Inc | Sidell, FL 34266 | $202,875 |
7 | Robert J Flint Jr | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $142,839 |
8 | Robert J Flint | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $142,397 |
9 | Utopia Farms LLC | Hayesville, NC 28904 | $132,250 |
10 | , | $130,937 | |
11 | Goracke Apiaries LLC | Punta Gorda, FL 33982 | $124,308 |
12 | James Arlin Hawkins- Speckled Dog, LLC | Sarasota, FL 34241 | $120,656 |
13 | Jay Holmes | Sarasota, FL 34240 | $110,556 |
14 | Glenn Peachey | Myakka City, FL 34251 | $88,056 |
15 | Steven W Flint | Arcadia, FL 34266 | $85,269 |
16 | The Plant Farm Inc | Sarasota, FL 34240 | $84,750 |
17 | Porter G Hamilton | Sarasota, FL 34240 | $81,643 |
18 | Hales Land & Cattle LLC | Okeechobee, FL 34974 | $80,454 |
19 | L T Partners, Lllp | Sarasota, FL 34240 | $69,553 |
20 | H & H Nursery Inc. | Bradenton, FL 34212 | $60,325 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>