Farm Subsidy information
Seminole County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Seminole County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 160
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Seminole County, Florida totaled $8,532,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Crescent T S Cattle Co Inc | Scottsmoor, FL 32775 | $25,434 |
42 | Michael M Chun | Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 | $25,000 |
43 | Mihee Chun | Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 | $25,000 |
44 | Samuel S Im | Apopka, FL 32703 | $25,000 |
45 | Kay Hong | Apopka, FL 32703 | $25,000 |
46 | Mike Hong | Apopka, FL 32703 | $25,000 |
47 | Laurel S Im | Apopka, FL 32703 | $25,000 |
48 | Carol Bodiford | Osteen, FL 32764 | $23,922 |
49 | Bobby D Bodiford | Osteen, FL 32764 | $23,922 |
50 | John G Maijub | Okemah, OK 74859 | $23,125 |
51 | Glen H Tallent | Zellwood, FL 32798 | $21,844 |
52 | Evans Groves Inc | Oviedo, FL 32762 | $21,060 |
53 | Joseph Allen Dorn | Lake Monroe, FL 32747 | $20,603 |
54 | Lee Ranch Inc | Oviedo, FL 32765 | $20,520 |
55 | Norma Jean Hamil | Oviedo, FL 32766 | $19,380 |
56 | Branching Out Nurseries Inc | Longwood, FL 32750 | $18,763 |
57 | Js2 Cattle LLC | Geneva, FL 32732 | $18,182 |
58 | Rudolph Jones | Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 | $17,931 |
59 | Ernestine Jones | Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 | $17,931 |
60 | Designing Women Landscaping Inc | Sanford, FL 32771 | $17,611 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”