Farm Subsidy information
Suwannee County, Florida
Total Subsidies in Suwannee County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,357
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Suwannee County, Florida totaled $68,554,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Wade Barnett | O Brien, FL 32071 | $502,167 |
22 | Huntsman Tree Supplier Inc | Lake City, FL 32024 | $500,000 |
23 | Claude Starling Jr | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $499,865 |
24 | Dewane Knighton | O Brien, FL 32071 | $494,295 |
25 | Shade Tree Nursery LLC | Mc Alpin, FL 32062 | $492,883 |
26 | A W Gaylard Jr | O Brien, FL 32071 | $470,170 |
27 | Kelby Sanchez | Old Town, FL 32680 | $466,466 |
28 | C Gail Wainwright | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $437,997 |
29 | Harold Land II | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $436,022 |
30 | Brantley Dairy Farm Inc | Mc Alpin, FL 32062 | $422,181 |
31 | Gwinn Brothers Farm LLC | Mc Alpin, FL 32062 | $414,214 |
32 | Skipper Honey Company Inc | Live Oak, FL 32064 | $362,749 |
33 | George Wedsted | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $360,717 |
34 | Sammy J Starling | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $345,600 |
35 | Herman Sanchez Jr | Old Town, FL 32680 | $337,645 |
36 | Bracewell Farms | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $332,951 |
37 | Roberson Brothers | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $332,192 |
38 | Lamar Jenkins | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $317,298 |
39 | Garrett Brothers Farm Inc | Branford, FL 32008 | $316,442 |
40 | Hatch Brothers Farms Inc | Branford, FL 32008 | $312,501 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”