Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Suwannee County, Florida, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 67
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Suwannee County, Florida totaled $1,132,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | W M Lloyd Jr | Lake City, FL 32024 | $24,199 |
22 | Sidney J Lord | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $22,074 |
23 | Richard G Watson | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $22,050 |
24 | Frances Townsend | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $21,387 |
25 | Joseph A Jordan | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $20,589 |
26 | William L Clowser | Wellborn, FL 32094 | $15,274 |
27 | Timothy F Johnson | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $12,853 |
28 | Donald Lee Townsend Jr | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $10,929 |
29 | Clifford D Townsend | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $10,928 |
30 | Eunice S Herko | O Brien, FL 32071 | $10,609 |
31 | David Randall Ratliff | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $9,570 |
32 | William Andrews | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $9,261 |
33 | William James Henning | Live Oak, FL 32060 | $6,400 |
34 | Dess Fennell Jr | Mc Alpin, FL 32062 | $5,166 |
35 | Dale Bradow | O Brien, FL 32071 | $4,955 |
36 | Guy O Hygema | Branford, FL 32008 | $4,345 |
37 | Benjamin H Lacy Jr | Live Oak, FL 32064 | $3,705 |
38 | Ross Brothers | Branford, FL 32008 | $3,500 |
39 | Mark L Crusaw | Wellborn, FL 32094 | $2,722 |
40 | Don G Philpot | Norcross, GA 30092 | $2,574 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”