Total Disaster Programs in Union County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 205
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Union County, Florida totaled $4,129,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Amos E Howard | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $717,732 |
2 | Doyle E Williams | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $230,218 |
3 | Double W Farm Inc | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $227,102 |
4 | Joshua E Gaskins | Lake City, FL 32025 | $204,294 |
5 | Karl E Williams | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $199,846 |
6 | Gaskins Apiaries Inc | Lake City, FL 32025 | $175,466 |
7 | Hipp Farms LLC | Gainesville, FL 32608 | $172,017 |
8 | Joshua Smith | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $147,304 |
9 | Lowell L Waters | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $112,403 |
10 | John Carl Howard | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $102,038 |
11 | Albert Marvin Smith Estate | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $76,968 |
12 | Pam Renae Williams | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $74,527 |
13 | M Wayne Smith | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $67,077 |
14 | Charles C Howard | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $64,423 |
15 | Little Creek Farms | Alachua, FL 32615 | $62,680 |
16 | Melissa M Williams | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $61,355 |
17 | Joshua C Farley | Penney Farms, FL 32079 | $58,655 |
18 | Franco Medina | Lake City, FL 32024 | $53,424 |
19 | Robert Lee Cason | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $50,437 |
20 | Michael Dukes | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $47,533 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>