Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Union County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Union County, Florida totaled $545,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel A Harden | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $7,615 |
22 | S Bryan Hendricks | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $7,345 |
23 | Gregory Box | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $7,105 |
24 | Kevin Box | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $7,105 |
25 | W D Andrews Sr | Brooker, FL 32622 | $7,075 |
26 | W S Howard Jr | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $6,993 |
27 | Gail Duke Emerson | Alachua, FL 32615 | $5,830 |
28 | Daniel Tomlinson | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $5,530 |
29 | John Henry Whitehead Jr | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $5,175 |
30 | Lowell E Dukes | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $4,390 |
31 | Calvin G Ward | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $4,070 |
32 | James R Stalnaker | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $4,050 |
33 | Nelson A Croft | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $3,855 |
34 | Donald W Graham | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $3,770 |
35 | Samuel A Johns | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $3,710 |
36 | John Carl Howard | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $3,505 |
37 | Salvador Perez | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $3,235 |
38 | James E Whitehead | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $3,003 |
39 | Sandra L Tyre | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $2,950 |
40 | Clarence Seay | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $2,643 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”