Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Union County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 60
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Union County, Florida totaled $545,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Joshua C Farley | Penney Farms, FL 32079 | $57,354 |
2 | Amos E Howard | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $55,488 |
3 | Avery C Roberts | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $44,298 |
4 | M Wayne Smith | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $32,604 |
5 | Albert Marvin Smith Estate | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $24,402 |
6 | Joseph J Hendricks | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $23,215 |
7 | Jack D Cason | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $19,640 |
8 | Robert Lee Cason | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $18,572 |
9 | Carlton Bielling | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $16,880 |
10 | Roland J Parrish | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $15,265 |
11 | Doyle E Williams | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $12,650 |
12 | Norman Farm And Cattle Company In | Raiford, FL 32083 | $12,590 |
13 | Paul Waters | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $11,735 |
14 | Curtis L Addison | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $11,658 |
15 | Carl Bielling | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $9,970 |
16 | James Hunter Ketcham | Lake City, FL 32024 | $9,801 |
17 | Billy R Elixson | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $9,792 |
18 | Charles C Howard | Lake Butler, FL 32054 | $9,560 |
19 | David R Rivers | Glen Saint Mary, FL 32040 | $9,480 |
20 | Edward Shadd | Raiford, FL 32083 | $7,781 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>