Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Volusia County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 140
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Volusia County, Florida totaled $585,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Helen Veino | Osteen, FL 32764 | $3,873 |
42 | Albert H Pell Inc | Osteen, FL 32764 | $3,770 |
43 | Maryjo Mcmillon | Orange City, FL 32774 | $3,690 |
44 | T M Mcdonald | Daytona Beach, FL 32118 | $3,561 |
45 | Wilson Driggers | Osteen, FL 32764 | $3,157 |
46 | Pamela Driggers | Osteen, FL 32764 | $3,157 |
47 | Robert W Neely | De Leon Springs, FL 32130 | $3,094 |
48 | Joseph Dale Nelson | Seville, FL 32190 | $2,963 |
49 | David Carlton | New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168 | $2,841 |
50 | Barbara A Carlton | New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168 | $2,841 |
51 | Roy G Jacobs | Dawson, GA 39842 | $2,726 |
52 | Wayne Jacobs | Oviedo, FL 32765 | $2,726 |
53 | Lynda R Schroeder | Sanford, FL 32772 | $2,687 |
54 | Jeff Russell | Geneva, FL 32732 | $2,680 |
55 | Debra Bowman | Geneva, FL 32732 | $2,680 |
56 | Henry Farms & Ferns | Seville, FL 32190 | $2,555 |
57 | Margaret Raulerson | Seville, FL 32190 | $2,515 |
58 | David Daugharty | De Leon Springs, FL 32130 | $2,223 |
59 | Samuel Daugharty | De Leon Springs, FL 32130 | $2,223 |
60 | Executive Real Estate Inc | Pierson, FL 32180 | $2,163 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”