Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Volusia County, Florida, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 140
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Volusia County, Florida totaled $585,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Frank Bailey | Ormond Beach, FL 32174 | $1,358 |
82 | Rudolph Pleterski | New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168 | $1,344 |
83 | William A Denauro | Cabool, MO 65689 | $1,270 |
84 | Honey Bairs Of Central Fl Inc | New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168 | $1,188 |
85 | Evelyn Sutton | New Smyrna Beach, FL 32168 | $1,052 |
86 | Danny Raulerson | Seville, FL 32190 | $1,006 |
87 | James Proskine | De Leon Springs, FL 32130 | $994 |
88 | Regenia H Proskine | Norwich, NY 13815 | $994 |
89 | Jack B Shuman | De Leon Springs, FL 32130 | $869 |
90 | Joyce A Shuman | De Leon Springs, FL 32130 | $869 |
91 | Johnny Sixma | Lake Helen, FL 32744 | $822 |
92 | William W Handley Jr | Oak Hill, FL 32759 | $808 |
93 | Nancy Handley | Oak Hill, FL 32759 | $808 |
94 | Elva Ray Pearson | De Leon Springs, FL 32130 | $754 |
95 | Harvey Slayton | Oviedo, FL 32762 | $725 |
96 | James L Bell | Seville, FL 32190 | $641 |
97 | Deborah Murray | Deland, FL 32720 | $601 |
98 | Paul M Pickett | New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170 | $599 |
99 | Mary Sue Pickett | New Smyrna Beach, FL 32170 | $599 |
100 | Ruth F Pellicer | Daytona Beach, FL 32117 | $597 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”