Counter Cyclical Program in Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 28,138
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Georgia totaled $1,100,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Notloh Farms | Camilla, GA 31730 | $830,466 |
82 | Goolsby Farms | Dawson, GA 39842 | $814,363 |
83 | Kevin & Charity Tabb Farms | Damascus, GA 39841 | $813,101 |
84 | Charles B & Jimmy L Lane | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $801,054 |
85 | Mcclure Farms | Doerun, GA 31744 | $798,899 |
86 | Whitehead Farms | Ashburn, GA 31714 | $791,056 |
87 | Big Drain Farms | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $788,119 |
88 | Trinity Farms | Doerun, GA 31744 | $783,808 |
89 | J & D Hembree Farms | Doerun, GA 31744 | $783,748 |
90 | Rentz Farms Partnership | Leary, GA 39862 | $783,250 |
91 | K & P Farming Partnership | Blakely, GA 39823 | $781,024 |
92 | Mac Farms Partnership | Douglas, GA 31535 | $780,387 |
93 | Carter Farms | Sylvester, GA 31791 | $774,562 |
94 | Sudaco Farms Partnership | Ambrose, GA 31512 | $772,494 |
95 | Roger T Price Farms | Quitman, GA 31643 | $769,024 |
96 | Deese Farms General Partnership | Newton, GA 39870 | $758,840 |
97 | Hillside Farms | Arlington, GA 39813 | $756,922 |
98 | David Bryan Farms | Sumner, GA 31789 | $751,009 |
99 | Mason Farms Inc | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $743,895 |
100 | David Howell | Doerun, GA 31744 | $743,438 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”