Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Georgia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 14,677
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Georgia totaled $1,409,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John Bridges Farm Gp | Brinson, GA 39825 | $2,639,066 |
42 | Davis Farms | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $2,596,694 |
43 | Luther Griffin Farm | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $2,577,682 |
44 | Eldorendo Farms | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $2,572,296 |
45 | Mims Farm | Millen, GA 30442 | $2,571,934 |
46 | First Port City Bank ** | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $2,529,396 |
47 | Brannen Family Farms Partnership | Statesboro, GA 30458 | $2,498,141 |
48 | Scott Farms G P | Brinson, GA 39825 | $2,487,208 |
49 | T & T Sumner Farms | Sumner, GA 31789 | $2,419,617 |
50 | K&k Farms | Newton, GA 39870 | $2,384,953 |
51 | Lindsey Farms Gp | Norman Park, GA 31771 | $2,345,161 |
52 | Dixon Farm Supply Inc | Alapaha, GA 31622 | $2,340,372 |
53 | Big Drain Farms | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $2,316,950 |
54 | Cynergy Farms | Thomasville, GA 31757 | $2,278,521 |
55 | Warbington Farms | Vienna, GA 31092 | $2,223,264 |
56 | Davis Farms Partnership | Sylvester, GA 31791 | $2,052,747 |
57 | Davis Family Farms | Doerun, GA 31744 | $2,042,717 |
58 | Mathis Farm General Partners | Arlington, GA 39813 | $1,987,244 |
59 | Red Land Ag Partners | Shellman, GA 39886 | $1,984,280 |
60 | Mvp Farms Gp | Newton, GA 39870 | $1,982,976 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”