Farm Subsidy information
Berrien County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Berrien County, Georgia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,511
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Berrien County, Georgia totaled $214,435,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farmers & Merchants Bank ** | Nashville, GA 31639 | $3,570,053 |
2 | Charles Donald Rogers | Tifton, GA 31794 | $3,193,653 |
3 | Carlos Vickers | Nashville, GA 31639 | $3,184,578 |
4 | Lamar Vickers | Nashville, GA 31639 | $3,071,471 |
5 | Phillip Akins | Nashville, GA 31639 | $2,812,119 |
6 | Brion M Akins | Nashville, GA 31639 | $2,763,133 |
7 | Carl Mathis Dixon | Alapaha, GA 31622 | $2,437,191 |
8 | Jeffrey W Williams | Nashville, GA 31639 | $2,342,223 |
9 | Prince Farms Inc | Nashville, GA 31639 | $2,326,269 |
10 | Kylon J Fort | Nashville, GA 31639 | $2,214,621 |
11 | Aggeorgia Farm Credit Aca ** | Ocilla, GA 31774 | $2,136,747 |
12 | Southern Grace Farms Inc | Enigma, GA 31749 | $2,110,022 |
13 | David Hendley | Nashville, GA 31639 | $2,086,111 |
14 | Alton Parrish Akins | Nashville, GA 31639 | $1,971,613 |
15 | Ronnie Dale Hall | Tifton, GA 31793 | $1,907,464 |
16 | George Samuel Rogers | Tifton, GA 31794 | $1,817,060 |
17 | L E Watson III | Nashville, GA 31639 | $1,809,114 |
18 | Jaclyn Dixon Ford | Alapaha, GA 31622 | $1,759,508 |
19 | Tommy Lee | Nashville, GA 31639 | $1,757,361 |
20 | Harold D Dillingham | Alapaha, GA 31622 | $1,697,983 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>