Farm Subsidy information
Bulloch County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Bulloch County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,845
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bulloch County, Georgia totaled $335,774,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Charles L Finch | Portal, GA 30450 | $686,491 |
102 | Aubrey Aldrich | Statesboro, GA 30458 | $666,271 |
103 | Five Lock Farms LLC | Brooklet, GA 30415 | $653,168 |
104 | D & D Tobacco Farms | Register, GA 30452 | $652,057 |
105 | Rafe A Newton | Portal, GA 30450 | $647,593 |
106 | Brannen - Rushing Inc | Register, GA 30452 | $642,216 |
107 | Coltco Inc | Statesboro, GA 30458 | $635,471 |
108 | Finch Farms Inc | Garfield, GA 30425 | $633,411 |
109 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $630,175 |
110 | Kevin Deal Farms | Statesboro, GA 30458 | $628,685 |
111 | Jay Robert Clarke | Register, GA 30452 | $627,343 |
112 | Carl M Williams | Statesboro, GA 30458 | $611,011 |
113 | Jim Rushing Farms Inc | Register, GA 30452 | $606,387 |
114 | William Jefferson Spence | Statesboro, GA 30461 | $603,418 |
115 | Walter C Grimes | Twin City, GA 30471 | $585,068 |
116 | Kek Farms Inc | Brooklet, GA 30415 | $570,016 |
117 | George T Beasley Jr | Statesboro, GA 30461 | $563,916 |
118 | Tim Lee | Statesboro, GA 30461 | $562,868 |
119 | William S Hatcher | Statesboro, GA 30459 | $558,777 |
120 | John Emery Brannen | Register, GA 30452 | $558,279 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”