Farm Subsidy information
Crawford County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Crawford County, Georgia, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Crawford County, Georgia totaled $1,491,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Raymond O Ballard | Macon, GA 31210 | $1,904 |
22 | Edgar Parent | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $1,582 |
23 | Hines Farms Inc | Macon, GA 31216 | $1,537 |
24 | Aggeorgia Farm Credit Aca ** | Ocilla, GA 31774 | $1,526 |
25 | Evans Farms Gp | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $1,512 |
26 | Jean O Vining | Culloden, GA 31016 | $1,504 |
27 | Michael A Giles | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $1,196 |
28 | Barbara Gibson King | Denton, GA 31532 | $1,100 |
29 | G Tyler Mitchell Jr | Culloden, GA 31016 | $974 |
30 | Georgia Pecan Farms L L C | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $945 |
31 | Thomas Redding Cleveland | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $802 |
32 | Alfred L Pearson Jr | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $559 |
33 | A Lawton Pearson III | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $559 |
34 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $403 |
35 | Evans Investment Company | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $377 |
36 | William Grady Shaw | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $305 |
37 | John C Giles III | Byron, GA 31008 | $302 |
38 | Cpp Farms LLC | Warner Robins, GA 31088 | $274 |
39 | Benjamin F Hortman | Roberta, GA 31078 | $259 |
40 | Kenneth W Hancock | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $208 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”