Farm Subsidy information
Decatur County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Decatur County, Georgia, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 144
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Decatur County, Georgia totaled $13,088,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Faye H Herndon | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $3,362 |
82 | Phr Partners Lp | Madison, GA 30650 | $3,267 |
83 | Susan Knight Maxwell | Whigham, GA 39897 | $3,199 |
84 | P D Miller Farms LLC | Attapulgus, GA 39815 | $3,112 |
85 | Geraldine Ward | Attapulgus, GA 39815 | $3,097 |
86 | Jerry D Sharber | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $3,062 |
87 | Linda J Johnson | Tallahassee, FL 32312 | $2,998 |
88 | Darryl L Boyett | Climax, GA 39834 | $2,872 |
89 | J Daniel Davis | Tallahassee, FL 32303 | $2,646 |
90 | Slough Farms Inc | Pelham, GA 31779 | $2,535 |
91 | James A Ricks | Tallahassee, FL 32308 | $2,479 |
92 | Wade Kirkland | Brinson, GA 39825 | $2,428 |
93 | Dorislynn White Padgett | Climax, GA 39834 | $2,333 |
94 | Anna M Bolden | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $2,254 |
95 | Brown Family Properties | Appling, GA 30802 | $2,114 |
96 | Justin Mark Maxwell | Whigham, GA 39897 | $2,084 |
97 | Curtis E Ward | Tallahassee, FL 32315 | $1,970 |
98 | Mosquito Creek-t&t Farms LLC | Bainbridge, GA 39818 | $1,928 |
99 | Carl Cloud Road Land Holdings LLC | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $1,838 |
100 | Plantation S Cattle Co | Bainbridge, GA 39819 | $1,795 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”