Market Loss Assistance Program in Decatur County, Georgia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 497
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Decatur County, Georgia totaled $8,921,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lowell E Dollar | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $113,466 |
22 | Pine Hill Farm | Bainbridge, GA 31717 | $103,924 |
23 | Davis Farms | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $95,872 |
24 | Yarbrough Farms Inc | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $91,788 |
25 | Wallace R Bishop | Whigham, GA 39897 | $86,875 |
26 | Alan Rufus Davis | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $81,531 |
27 | Mark Devane Davis | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $81,530 |
28 | Stepreman Farms Inc | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $80,193 |
29 | Rusty Davis | Bainbridge, GA 39819 | $76,876 |
30 | Dollar Family Farms | Bainbridge, GA 39818 | $76,720 |
31 | John Bridges Sr | Brinson, GA 39825 | $76,558 |
32 | John Bridges Jr | Brinson, GA 39825 | $76,537 |
33 | Bill Bridges | Brinson, GA 31725 | $76,536 |
34 | Bobby Barber Jr | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $75,536 |
35 | Jerry A Davis | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $74,105 |
36 | Kenneth Godwin | Climax, GA 31734 | $73,048 |
37 | James Tim Shirah | Camilla, GA 31730 | $71,171 |
38 | Raymond Lamar Shirah | Camilla, GA 31730 | $71,169 |
39 | Spring Creek Enterprises Inc | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $68,181 |
40 | W C Phillips | Bainbridge, GA 39819 | $67,316 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”