Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Dodge County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 83
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Dodge County, Georgia totaled $4,122,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Christopher Cape | Hawkinsville, GA 31036 | $63,904 |
22 | Jeffery Lee Gay | Milan, GA 31060 | $61,959 |
23 | Woodard Brothers | Chauncey, GA 31011 | $61,722 |
24 | Neva Jane Horton | Rhine, GA 31077 | $60,374 |
25 | Jimmy S Cofield | Eastman, GA 31023 | $53,394 |
26 | Matthew Jones | Cochran, GA 31014 | $49,365 |
27 | William Brett Cape | Eastman, GA 31023 | $49,119 |
28 | Maria W Kelly | Chauncey, GA 31011 | $42,290 |
29 | Southland Plantation LLC | Eastman, GA 31023 | $39,544 |
30 | Milton Ussery | Fitzgerald, GA 31750 | $38,597 |
31 | Ellis B Cofield Jr | Eastman, GA 31023 | $37,048 |
32 | Brigitte Bovee | Hawkinsville, GA 31036 | $35,946 |
33 | Blake Thomas Woodard | Eastman, GA 31023 | $27,679 |
34 | Henry W Walker | Eastman, GA 31023 | $26,226 |
35 | John Clifford Gay | Milan, GA 31060 | $25,804 |
36 | James Dan Mccranie | Rhine, GA 31077 | $25,404 |
37 | Taylor C Farms LLC | Chester, GA 31012 | $24,797 |
38 | Brown's Farm At Chauncey Inc | Chauncey, GA 31011 | $23,488 |
39 | Lena J Gay | Milan, GA 31060 | $23,339 |
40 | Christopher Lawrence Cape | Eastman, GA 31023 | $23,054 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”