Farm Subsidy information
Harris County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Harris County, Georgia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 171
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Harris County, Georgia totaled $2,352,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Raymond H Reames | Hamilton, GA 31811 | $117,544 |
2 | Jim Fuller | Ellerslie, GA 31807 | $90,013 |
3 | Canaan Farms | Pine Mountain, GA 31822 | $86,496 |
4 | Diversified Trees Incorporated | Pine Mountain, GA 31822 | $82,709 |
5 | Clarence Borom | Waverly Hall, GA 31831 | $82,296 |
6 | Ronald Overby | Columbus, GA 31904 | $80,731 |
7 | James D Hart | Waverly Hall, GA 31831 | $79,922 |
8 | Sandra S Reames | Hamilton, GA 31811 | $76,022 |
9 | Robert Daniel Clary | Waverly Hall, GA 31831 | $66,176 |
10 | Bobbie H Mclemore | Waverly Hall, GA 31831 | $65,215 |
11 | Danny Michael Blackwell | Columbus, GA 31906 | $63,866 |
12 | Billy Joe Kivette | West Point, GA 31833 | $56,871 |
13 | William Gary Lowman | St Petersburg, FL 33701 | $55,645 |
14 | Reames Management Co LLC | Hamilton, GA 31811 | $54,030 |
15 | Xxxxxx X Xxxxxx | Hamilton, GA 99999 | $53,964 |
16 | Dorothy M Trammell | Pine Mountain, GA 31822 | $41,016 |
17 | Juanita Ingram | Waverly Hall, GA 31831 | $40,484 |
18 | Jimmy C Stubbs | Columbus, GA 31909 | $39,936 |
19 | Overby Limousin Farm | Columbus, GA 31904 | $38,281 |
20 | Earl L Flanagan | Ellerslie, GA 31807 | $34,992 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>