Farm Subsidy information
Macon County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Macon County, Georgia, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 290
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Macon County, Georgia totaled $11,469,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | J M Minor Family Farms Gp | Andersonville, GA 31711 | $965,198 |
2 | Ja Minor Family Farm Gp | Leslie, GA 31764 | $579,451 |
3 | A M Bickley Inc | Marshallville, GA 31057 | $430,363 |
4 | Minor Brothers Farm Partnership | Andersonville, GA 31711 | $423,385 |
5 | C J Farms | Marshallville, GA 31057 | $419,894 |
6 | Abs Henderson LLC | Elko, GA 31025 | $397,517 |
7 | Jaros Farms Inc | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $368,884 |
8 | Ideal Hay & Litter LLC | Ellaville, GA 31806 | $329,017 |
9 | Demeter Farms General Partnership | Elko, GA 31025 | $321,919 |
10 | Bone Farms LLC | Americus, GA 31709 | $311,071 |
11 | W Howard Brown Farms LLC | Montezuma, GA 31063 | $283,942 |
12 | Matthew K Powers | Marshallville, GA 31057 | $251,858 |
13 | Todd Bone | Americus, GA 31709 | $215,986 |
14 | Harp Farms Inc | Montezuma, GA 31063 | $193,995 |
15 | Barrington Dairy LLC | Montezuma, GA 31063 | $175,808 |
16 | Aggeorgia Farm Credit Aca ** | Ocilla, GA 31774 | $167,858 |
17 | Jamie Hughes | Marshallville, GA 31057 | $158,731 |
18 | Pearson Farm | Fort Valley, GA 31030 | $151,418 |
19 | Adam Charles Hughes | Marshallville, GA 31057 | $148,971 |
20 | Chase Farms Inc | Oglethorpe, GA 31068 | $143,969 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>