Farm Subsidy information
Marion County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Marion County, Georgia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 119
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marion County, Georgia totaled $943,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gary Powell | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $111,331 |
| 2 | A Kim Welch | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $93,073 |
| 3 | Todd Powell Farms | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $69,670 |
| 4 | Muckalee Creek Farm Inc | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $43,862 |
| 5 | Vance Mccorkle | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $29,763 |
| 6 | Richard L Morgan | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $28,214 |
| 7 | Edward W Reynolds | Mauk, GA 31058 | $23,463 |
| 8 | Ronnie L Singleton | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $21,564 |
| 9 | Reuben Kemp Tyler | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $20,721 |
| 10 | David Todd Powell Estate | Americus, GA 31709 | $17,595 |
| 11 | Rustin Farm | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $17,240 |
| 12 | Waller Farm | Mauk, GA 31058 | $16,540 |
| 13 | Frederick Times | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $13,538 |
| 14 | Ricky Maxwell | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $10,063 |
| 15 | Radford Kyle Welch | Mauk, GA 31058 | $9,668 |
| 16 | Brandon Welch | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $9,114 |
| 17 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $8,085 |
| 18 | R D Owens | Americus, GA 31719 | $8,043 |
| 19 | James Kenneth Widner | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $7,501 |
| 20 | Bobby D Sizemore III | Buena Vista, GA 31803 | $7,446 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf