Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Mitchell County, Georgia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 93
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Mitchell County, Georgia totaled $323,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | B W Hughes Jr | Camilla, GA 31730 | $4,022 |
22 | Faye Marie West | Meigs, GA 31765 | $4,010 |
23 | Randall Stanaland | Pelham, GA 31779 | $3,637 |
24 | Bradford Mcfarland | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $3,569 |
25 | L L Chason Jr | Pelham, GA 31779 | $3,523 |
26 | William H Walton | Pelham, GA 31779 | $3,426 |
27 | Woody Eubanks Farms LLC | Sale City, GA 31784 | $3,425 |
28 | Johnny Taylor Farms | Pelham, GA 31779 | $3,181 |
29 | R Morrell Farms Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $3,166 |
30 | Chason Farms | Pelham, GA 31779 | $3,057 |
31 | Daniel Jackson Baker III | Sale City, GA 31784 | $2,859 |
32 | Brent Walden Collins | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,163 |
33 | Michael L Willis | Pelham, GA 31779 | $2,147 |
34 | Joseph E Rackley III | Camilla, GA 31730 | $2,138 |
35 | Mack Hays | Doerun, GA 31744 | $2,126 |
36 | William E Lamberth | Sale City, GA 31784 | $1,989 |
37 | Grogan Farms Inc | Sale City, GA 31784 | $1,922 |
38 | Big Slough Farms Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $1,870 |
39 | Billy V Faircloth | Camilla, GA 31730 | $1,860 |
40 | Eddie Anthony Godwin | Pelham, GA 31779 | $1,656 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”