Emergency Conservation Program in Mitchell County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 261
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Mitchell County, Georgia totaled $7,890,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Edward Scott Summerlin | Newton, GA 39870 | $42,940 |
42 | Frank Wetherbee Farms LLC | Albany, GA 31706 | $42,280 |
43 | Marcus Collins | Pelham, GA 31779 | $40,579 |
44 | River Hil Farms Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $40,274 |
45 | Harry C Sullivan | Camilla, GA 31730 | $40,127 |
46 | Lee Sheffield Farms LLC | Damascus, GA 39841 | $38,882 |
47 | Daniel W Connell | Sale City, GA 31784 | $37,724 |
48 | Robert H Baggs | Camilla, GA 31730 | $36,765 |
49 | Charles Richard Geer | Cordele, GA 31015 | $36,199 |
50 | R Morrell Farms Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $35,385 |
51 | W A Snipes | Baconton, GA 31716 | $34,234 |
52 | Jsc Cattle Company LLC | Camilla, GA 31730 | $34,035 |
53 | Martin Adams Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $32,134 |
54 | Adams & Walker Inc | Camilla, GA 31730 | $29,376 |
55 | Daniel G Morrell Estate | Camilla, GA 31730 | $27,985 |
56 | Peter C Rackley | Camilla, GA 31730 | $27,674 |
57 | G & G Farms | Camilla, GA 31730 | $27,340 |
58 | Charles Lodge | Pelham, GA 31779 | $26,786 |
59 | Bradford Mcfarland | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $25,686 |
60 | Clay Lamar | Sale City, GA 31784 | $25,430 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”