Conservation Reserve Program in Mitchell County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 398
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mitchell County, Georgia totaled $10,433,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | William W Kidd | Newton, GA 39870 | $20,097 |
122 | J Leonard Eubanks Mrtl Tr | Pelham, GA 31779 | $20,060 |
123 | Robert J Giachetti Jr | Clermont, FL 34711 | $19,558 |
124 | Clay Lamar | Sale City, GA 31784 | $19,475 |
125 | C W Swain | Sale City, GA 31784 | $19,050 |
126 | David Wayne Oliver | Camilla, GA 31730 | $18,705 |
127 | Kathy H Holley | Albany, GA 31708 | $18,597 |
128 | Lenora J Butler | Pelham, GA 31779 | $18,282 |
129 | Jeffrey Dean Brady | Flower Mound, TX 75028 | $17,540 |
130 | Dera Mae Bostick | Camilla, GA 31730 | $17,495 |
131 | Dewey Robinson | Baconton, GA 31716 | $17,156 |
132 | Paul Richter | Pelham, GA 31779 | $17,043 |
133 | Betty Johnson Shiver | Camilla, GA 31730 | $16,673 |
134 | Mrs Willie Curles Mock | Meigs, GA 31765 | $16,458 |
135 | Alice Hand Mikkleson | Winter Park, FL 32789 | $15,906 |
136 | Bonita Richter | Pelham, GA 31779 | $15,588 |
137 | Elliot James Jenkins | Tallahassee, FL 32303 | $15,541 |
138 | Matthew Acree | Camilla, GA 31730 | $15,434 |
139 | Elsie Hand | Pelham, GA 31779 | $15,260 |
140 | Azalea Thompson | Albany, GA 31721 | $15,066 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”